|
Adoption news - 5 -
Out
of the Shadows
[
Gay Couples
sue over Okla. Adoption Law
] [
Children's Groups appeal overturning of Florida Gay Adoption Ban
]
[
Britain
Parliament Oks Gay Adoption
] [
Lesbian Couple from VT Prevail in Adoption Suit
] [
Out of the Shadows ]
[
ACLU
Dismayed by 11th Circuit Appeal Upholding Floridas Anti-Gay Adoption Law
] [
US Adoptions Get Easier ]
[
Supreme
Court Lets Stand Floridas Gay Adoption Ban
] [
Experts Dispute Bush on Gay Adoption Issue
]
[
Adoptees
Deserve Access to Family Health Histories
] [
Committee Defeats Bill to Ban Gays from Adoption
]
[
Civil
Debate Over Civil Union ]
[ Study
Says Foreign Children Adapt Well
] [
Custody After Civil Union Pits States and Judges
]
[
Birth
Mothers vs Egg Donor Decision Upheld
] [
Hello I'm Your Sister - Our Father is Donor 150
]
[
Lund Family
Center Capital Campaign Remarks
] [
Unwed Fathers Fight for Babies Placed for Adoption by Mothers
]
[
Adoption
Institute Supports Gay Parents
] [
Gays See Shift in Momentum Toward Acceptance in Alabama
]
[
Judge
Rejects Law on Gay Adoptions
] [
Perdue vs Mississippi ] [
Gay
Marriage Losing Punch as Ballot Issue
]
[
Gay Couple
Awaits Adoption Ruling from US Court
] [
China Tightens Adoption Rules, U.S. Agencies Say
]
[
A Taste of
US Family Life, But Adoption in Limbo
] [
Gay Couple Win Lawsuit Against Adoption Web Site in Arizona...
]
[
Significant
Victory for Same Sex Couples in Oklahoma
] [
Report Urges States To Open Adoptee Records for Adults
]
[
State Court
Recognizes Gay Marriage From Elsewhere
] [
Miami Judge Rules Against Florida Gay Adoption Ban
]
[
House
Passes Bill Restricting Birth Certificates For Adoptions By Unmarried Couples
]
Out
of the Shadows
by Elizabeth Hunt
In the earliest
pictures Jill Lampman has of her older daughter, Elena’s
hair is short and choppy. There are dark circles under
her eyes. When Elena’s kindergarten teacher sent home
her first assignment – to bring in a baby photo for the
bulletin board – Jill knew she had to tell the teacher
her child’s story. Elena had spent her first three years
in a Romanian orphanage. “The first pictures I have of
her,” Jill says, “are not something I would want to
share.”
For families like
the Lampmans of Vancouver, Wash., speaking up about
adoption is not only a matter of pride, it is also often
a necessity. Too frequently, say many, those most
closely involved with adoption – adoptees, adoptive
parents and birth parents – must debunk misconceptions
and false assumptions.
It’s not that
people generally view adoption negatively. In fact,
according to a 2002 study by the Dave Thomas Foundations
for Adoption, almost two-thirds of Americans view
adoption “very favorably,” a figure that has risen
steadily in recent years. “Now adoption is seen as cause
for celebration,” says executive director Rita Soronen.
But, experts and advocates note, the “coming out” of
adoptive families in recent years has not yet produced a
corresponding increase in public understanding of
adoption issues. Because adoptive children face some
different developmental concerns than their non-adoptive
peers, and these concerns affect what happens in the
classroom, educators are among the people for whom an
accurate understanding of adoption is most important.
In particular,
teachers need to understand that certain lessons and
assignments can affect adoptive and non-adoptive
children very differently.
“I hear this
story all the time,” says Adam Pertman of the Evan B.
Donaldson Adoption Institute in New York. “A teacher
gives a family tree assignment, and she tries to be
sensitive, telling Johnny, who was adopted, ‘You can
choose who you want to put in your family tree.’ But
guess what? Johnny feels faced with divided loyalties –
he has to say who his ‘real’ family is. And his little
brain is bursting. He just can’t do it.”
For Josh Barrett,
a 19-year-old adoptee from Nashville, Inc., the
elementary and middle school years were the most
difficult. Adopted from foster care as a 7-year-old,
Josh remembers “lots of assignments I couldn’t do –
things like asking my grandparents for information about
our family heritage or bringing a baby picture for
show-and-tell. And it wasn’t just that I couldn’t do
them. I couldn’t really explain why, either, without
going into a lot of history that I didn’t want to go
into.”
Nor are the
obvious assignments – such as family trees and genetic
pedigrees, in which students trace a heritable trait
through members of their family – the only ones that
cause problems. Teachers may unknowingly broach a wide
range of subjects in ways that can be alienating to
students who were adopted. “In high school health class,
there may be no mention of adoption as a way to plan
families,” says Pat Johnston, who was an Indiana high
school teacher before becoming an adoption educator and
publisher. “Or adoption may be presented as a negative
outcome. In psychology class, for example, adoption may
come up as a problem situation.”
Johnston says
that her own children, whom she adopted, often “found
themselves steaming quietly or placed in the position of
having to defend their family and how it was formed.”
And Josh Barrett,
whose pre-adoption history includes being abused, says
the topic of child abuse should be handled with care as
well. “I heard it in psych class and in health class all
the time: ‘Kids who are abused grow up to abuse their
own kids,’ as though it was a given. For a long time I
thought I would grow up to be an abuser. It wasn’t until
I was halfway through high school that I figured out
that I had a choice in the matter.”
Knowledge and
understanding are keys to creating an atmosphere of
inclusion for adoptive students. Being aware that
adoptive students may well be hurt by a classmate’s
comment, “I don’t see how anyone could ‘abandon’ a baby
for someone else to raise,” can prompt a teacher to
provide a fuller, more realistic picture of adoption as
a responsible and loving option.
Similarly, choice
is often the key to creating assignments that work well
for all children regardless of how they joined their
families. A high school genetic pedigree assignment can
offer students the choice of tracing a trait through any
group of genetically related people – or examining the
heritable traits of plants or animals. An autobiography
assignment, potentially difficult for students who have
periods in their life about which they may not wish to
talk, can be transformed by allowing students to focus
on a particular chapter of their life.
And that tough
old chestnut, the family tree – which, after all, has
never lent itself well to the rich and complex way in
which people build their families – can give way to
“Circles of Caring” for younger students and, for middle
and high school students, family circles or genograms,
both of which are more flexible ways of tracing family
relationships.
It’s important,
though, that the same assignment choices are offered to
all students, says adoptive mother Jill Lampman. “If you
grant exceptions to just one or two adopted students,
that singles them out. Assignments should work for
everyone.”
A
Window on Family Diversity
Creating a
classroom that includes adoptive and non-adoptive
students equally may be the most powerful reason for
teachers to become more educated about adoption issues.
But what they learn will also serve them well in working
with other kinds of family diversity.
“Adoption is a
wonderful prism through which to view American families
today, because adoptive families come in all kinds,”
says Adam Pertman. “Single-parent, gay and lesbian,
multi-ethnic, blended. In f act, there’s only one kind
of family that adoptive families are not: the so-called
typical family with two parents and their two
offspring.”
The fact that
adoption’s history has been veiled in secrecy, and that
adoptions go through both public and private channels,
has meant that reliable adoption statistics have never
been very easy to come by, a fact that is only now
starting to change. But available information verifies
the impression that adoptive families are often diverse
in many other ways. Older parents, into their fifties
and beyond, for example, may choose adoption as a way to
start first or second families, and custodial
grandparents or other relatives sometimes also adopt the
children they care for, giving them dual roles in
children’s lives.
Adoptive families
are often multiracial, and the rate of transracial
adoption (in which adoptive parents and children are of
different races) has doubled in recent years, from less
than 8 percent of all U.S. adoptions in 1987 to more
than 15 percent by 2000.
International
adoption has seen enormous growth in the same period,
from just over 8.000 U.S. adoptions from abroad in 1989
to more than 20,000 in 2002. International adoption is
transracial in more than half of the cases; in almost
every case, it involves blending family members of
different cultures.
Single-parent
adoption is on the rise as well. Accounting for
one-third of all adoptions in 2000, single-parent
adoptions are estimated to have more than tripled since
the 1980s. They also provide one of the only measures –
and certainly an imperfect one – of gay and lesbian
adoption, also widely believed to have increased
substantially in the last 15 years. “With the growing
demographic of single-parent adoptions, there’s an
assumption that many gay and lesbian adoptions are
included in that number,” says Rita Soronen of the Dave
Thomas Foundation.
National data
from the mid-1990s reveal that anywhere from 1 million
to 9 million U.S. children have at least one gay parent,
figures that many believe to be conservative. But within
these numbers, the percentage of children who were
adopted by one or both gay parents is unknown.
Adoptive parents
have tended to be White and in the middle or upper
socioeconomic classes, and that remains true. But
increasing numbers of African American and Latino
parents are using adoption to build families as well.
Adoptions from foster care have risen, and these are
often initiated by Black and Latino parents, as well as
by parents who are not affluent. And step-child
adoptions are common across racial groups and
socioeconomic classes.
The many
different kinds of family diversity represented in
adoption give adoptive families layers of additional
richness and complexity, but these families may still
have different needs and concerns than their
non-adoptive counterparts.
Ruth-Arlene Howe,
a law professor at Boston College who has written
extensively on transracial adoption, says that parents
who form families in this way must also form a new
identity for their family – and themselves. When White
parents adopt Black children, she says, “They must
realize that they are no longer a ‘White family.’ They
need to consciously reconstruct their social circles,
their activities, even where they live to acknowledge
that fact.”
Teachers can
help. For example, says Howe, in the case of transracial
adoption, teachers can become allies and support systems
for students growing up in a culture other than the one
into which they were born. “They need to think, for
instance, about what kinds of family pictures they put
on the wall, to consider whether children will look at
those pictures and be able to see themselves there,” she
says.
Developmental Differences
Understanding
children’s individual needs and life histories is also
important when adoptees reach different stages in
dealing with their loss and identity. In elementary
school, adoptive children will often experience their
first grief over losing birth parents and will begin to
understand what adoption is, making them sensitive to
negative portrayals of adoption, says Pertman. “Children
at this age don’t think abstractly. They think
concretely. And so when they see a movie in which
everyone is laughing at the little bear who was adopted,
they see who they are as something to be laughed at.”
In adolescence,
adoptees may experience the tugs and pulls associated
with separation into adulthood and thus may become more
interested in meeting their birth parents. Transracially
adopted teens may wrestle more with their sense of
racial identity.
For children who
have been in foster care, the teens years may mark a
period of testing limits and pulling back from
relationships, says Rita Soronen. It’s important to
realize that what might seem like problem behavior in a
non-adoptive child can be “understandable, in light of
these kids’ backgrounds,” she adds. “Why would they open
up, why would they trust adults, when every relationship
they have ever had has been pulled away from them?”
Jenny Pettenger
says that school-based adoptee support groups could be
helpful, not only by offering adoptees a place to talk
and “vent” but also by serving an educational function
for schools.
Adoption advocate
Adam Pertman believes it is only a matter of time before
adoption issues are a regular part of an educator’s
professional development. “Adoption is a train headed in
only one direction,” he says. “And so is educating
people about adoption. I know we’ll be there when we all
understand that adoption is a fine, legitimate, equal
way of forming families.”
Elizabeth Hunt, Ph.D., is a freelance writer and
adoptive mother who lives in South Bend, Indiana.
Book/Journal: Teaching
Tolerance magazine
Article/Title:
“Out of the Shadows”
Author:
Elizabeth Hunt
Issue
#:
Fall 2003
Page(s): 38-43
©2003
Teaching Tolerance, Southern Poverty Law Center,
Montgomery, Ala. Reprinted by permission.
Launched in September 2001,
teaching tolerance.org offers an online digest of
tolerance-related news, monthly lesson plans,
interactive classroom activities, an educator forum,
downloadable back issues of Teaching Tolerance magazine
and much, much more. You may send a fax request to the
attention of Orders Department at (334)956-8486.
Back to top |