|
Adoption News - 24 -
Gay Couple Awaits
Adoption Ruling From US Court
[
Gay Couples
sue over Okla. Adoption Law
] [
Children's Groups appeal overturning of Florida Gay Adoption Ban
]
[
Britain
Parliament Oks Gay Adoption
] [
Lesbian Couple from VT Prevail in Adoption Suit
] [
Out of the Shadows ]
[
ACLU
Dismayed by 11th Circuit Appeal Upholding Floridas Anti-Gay Adoption Law
] [
US Adoptions Get Easier ]
[
Supreme
Court Lets Stand Floridas Gay Adoption Ban
] [
Experts Dispute Bush on Gay Adoption Issue
]
[
Adoptees
Deserve Access to Family Health Histories
] [
Committee Defeats Bill to Ban Gays from Adoption
]
[
Civil
Debate Over Civil Union ]
[ Study
Says Foreign Children Adapt Well
] [
Custody After Civil Union Pits States and Judges
]
[
Birth
Mothers vs Egg Donor Decision Upheld
] [
Hello I'm Your Sister - Our Father is Donor 150
]
[
Lund Family
Center Capital Campaign Remarks
] [
Unwed Fathers Fight for Babies Placed for Adoption by Mothers
]
[
Adoption
Institute Supports Gay Parents
] [
Gays See Shift in Momentum Toward Acceptance in Alabama
]
[
Judge
Rejects Law on Gay Adoptions
] [
Perdue vs Mississippi ] [
Gay
Marriage Losing Punch as Ballot Issue
]
[
Gay Couple
Awaits Adoption Ruling from US Court
] [
China Tightens Adoption Rules, U.S. Agencies Say
]
[
A Taste of
US Family Life, But Adoption in Limbo
] [
Gay Couple Win Lawsuit Against Adoption Web Site in Arizona...
]
[
Significant
Victory for Same Sex Couples in Oklahoma
] [
Report Urges States To Open Adoptee Records for Adults
]
[
State Court
Recognizes Gay Marriage From Elsewhere
] [
Miami Judge Rules Against Florida Gay Adoption Ban
]
[
House
Passes Bill Restricting Birth Certificates For Adoptions By Unmarried Couples
]

Gay Couple Awaits Adoption Ruling
From US Court
By Nicholas Riccardi, Times Staff
Writer
November
26, 2006
Denver —
It was a note from the Oklahoma
Health Department that started the
chain of events that would propel Ed
Swaya and Gregory Hampel into a
federal court here.
The two
men, partners for 13 years, had
arranged through courts in their
home state of Washington to adopt
their daughter, Vivian, whose
Oklahoma mother had agreed to give
the baby to the two men when she was
born in 2002.
When the
couple asked Oklahoma to issue her
birth certificate, the state sent a
form with spaces for the names of
the mother and father. Swaya and
Hampel crossed out the categories
and marked themselves as "parent #1"
and "parent #2."
The
state didn't accept it, and sent
back the form. The couple then
listed Hampel as the father and
Swaya as the mother. Oklahoma
rejected it, writing: "We could not
establish maternity for Mr. Swaya."
Nonetheless, Oklahoma's attorney
general warned that the state would
have to honor the legal adoption
order from Washington state.
The
Legislature stepped in, passing a
bill prohibiting the state from
acknowledging adoptions by same-sex
couples from other jurisdictions,
setting the stage for a legal battle
that some gay rights activists fear
could become increasingly common as
states seek to curtail the abilities
of same-sex couples to adopt
children.
Battles
over such adoptions date back almost
30 years, to the Florida campaign
led by singer Anita Bryant that
sought and achieved that state's ban
on adoption by gays in 1977. But, as
with same-sex marriage, the legal
situation involving adoption by gays
remains fragmented across the
country.
A
handful of states, including Utah
and Mississippi, have banned such
adoptions over the years, according
to the American Academy of
Pediatrics. Other states, including
California, permit such adoptions.
Courts
have dealt with these bans in
conflicting ways. In December 2004,
a federal judge in Little Rock,
Ark., struck down the state's ban on
gay foster parenting and adoptions.
Weeks later, the U.S. Supreme Court
declined to hear an appeal of a
ruling upholding Florida's ban.
Same-sex
adoptions became an issue in the
governor's race in Arkansas this
year, where both candidates called
for reinstating the state's ban. The
American Academy of Pediatrics says
16 other states discussed
constitutional amendments to ban gay
adoption this year.
Chris
Stovall, senior legal counsel at the
Alliance Defense Fund, a
conservative public interest legal
group, said legal issues surrounding
adoption by same-sex couples were
similar to those surrounding
same-sex marriage. "These things are
connected," he said. "Men and women
do have different roles and
contribute in different ways to the
upbringing of a child."
Ken
Upton, the attorney who sued
Oklahoma for Swaya, Hampel and two
other same-sex couples, also sees a
similarity to the issue of same-sex
marriage. "Foster care and adoption
are what we see as battlegrounds in
the conservative states," said
Upton, a senior staff attorney for
Lambda Legal, a gay rights group.
"That's the next frontier for people
trying to attack gay people."
Each
side cites studies to bolster its
stand. Opponents of gay adoption say
research has shown that children
thrive when they have parents of
each gender. Gay rights groups say
the same is true of children raised
by same-sex couples, and they note
that many of the largest family
medicine groups, such as the
American Academy of Pediatrics and
the American Psychological Assn.,
say homosexual parenting does not
have harmful effects on children.
Oklahoma
already prohibited same-sex couples
from adopting children when Swaya
and Hampel learned through an
adoption agency of a pregnant
19-year-old woman in Oklahoma City
who planned to put her baby up for
adoption. The couple wanted an open
adoption, in which the birth mother
would remain a part of their child's
life. The two men flew to Oklahoma
for the birth, met her family and
returned to Seattle with their new
daughter.
But
because of the law passed in
response to their quest for Vivian's
birth certificate, Swaya and Hampel
say, they cannot return to Oklahoma
for their daughter to get to know
her grandfather or other birth
relatives. (They have in the past
flown the birth mother to Seattle.)
"This is
hurting my daughter and keeping
families apart," Swaya, 37, a
marriage and family counselor, said.
Swaya
and Hampel sued Oklahoma, joined by
two lesbian couples who adopted
children in other states and then
moved to Oklahoma to find those
adoptions unrecognized. One couple,
Lucy and Jennifer Doel, adopted
their 6-year-old daughter in
California in 2002. In the court
case, the two cited an incident in
which their daughter had to be
rushed to the hospital in an
ambulance and medical personnel said
only the birth mother could
accompany her.
Oklahoma
officials could not be reached for
comment last week, but in court
papers they argued that their state
had the right to set its own policy
on adoptions by same-sex couples.
They argued that the purpose of the
law was "to halt the erosion of the
mainstream definition of the family
unit and provide the possibility for
the optimal environment for the
child's development in a home with a
male parent and a female parent."
In May,
a federal judge in Oklahoma found
that the law did "little if anything
to promote the traditional family
unit" and attempted "to penalize the
plaintiff children for the acts of
their parents."
The law
"in essence tells one of the adult
plaintiffs, 'You are no longer the
parent of your child,' " added U.S.
District Court Judge Robin J.
Cauthron.
On Nov.
17, the state argued before the U.S.
10th Circuit Court of Appeals in
Denver that Cauthron's decision
should be overturned. It could be
several months before a ruling is
issued.
nicholas.riccardi@latimes.com
Back To Top |